Cheltenham township permits10/18/2023 ![]() ![]() On June 11, 1997, the United States of America ("United States") filed a Complaint alleging that defendants, Township of Cheltenham ("Township") and the Zoning Hearing Board of Cheltenham Township ("Board"), denied Sidney Cohen's and Dorothy Cohen's petition for a zoning variance in violation of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. Knoell, III, Norristown, PA, for Defendants. Zoning Hearing Board of Cheltenham Township, Defendants. Lynch said the township is currently working with the DEP to upgrade the current sewer system.Sidney COHEN and Dorothy Cohen and Susan Cohen, Plaintiffs, “We can’t allow a building permit without the proper sewerage allocation,” said Lynch. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection currently has a sanitary sewerage moratorium in place for any additional connections for the township.Īt the present time, Cheltenham Township has approximately 48 connections, or equivalent dwelling units, available.Īccording to Lynch, the approved development plan, containing 222 units, would require roughly 190 connections, or EDUs. Matrix Development Group may still face some problems, after receiving land development approval. “They may not get land development approval until late summer or early fall,” said Lynch. ![]() Lynch said it will take between 90 and 120 days for the zoning hearing board to approve the document, at which time the developers will be able to apply for the necessary building permits. Now that Matrix Development Group has received zoning relief, the developers must submit a subdivision land development document, per township procedure. “The applicant proposed numerous plan modifications to accommodate the residents of the surrounding area,” said Friedman. “They wanted to maintain the open space.” “There were a small number of people who wanted nothing there,” said Lynch. Lynch said residents worried about overdevelopment believed the site should hold as few as 100 to 150 units, with other citizens believing the area should remain open space. ![]() “They questioned the impact the development would have on traffic and property values, if an age-restricted development was viable to the area, and if building on the site would cause over development.” “The community expressed concerns,” said Lynch. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |